search
Log In
Welcome to GATE BioTechnology, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
0 votes

Some tables are shelves. Some shelves are chairs. All chairs are benches. Which of the following conclusions can be deduced from the preceding sentences?

  1. At least one bench is a table
  2. At least one shell is a bench
  3. At least one chair is a table
  4. All benches are chairs
  1. Only i
  2. Only ii
  3. Only ii and iii
  4. Only iv
in Analytical Aptitude 7.9k points
recategorized by

Please log in or register to answer this question.

Answer:

Related questions

0 votes
0 answers
1
Given below are two statements $1$ and $2$, and two conclusions $I$ and $II$. $\text{Statement 1}$: All bacteria are microorganisms. $\text{Statement 2}$: All pathogens are microorganisms. $\text{Conclusion I}$: Some pathogens are bacteria. $\text{Conclusion II}$: All ... is correct Either conclusion $\text{I}$ or $\text{II}$ is correct Neither conclusion $\text{I}$ nor $\text{II}$ is correct
asked Mar 1 in Analytical Aptitude jothee 1.4k points
0 votes
0 answers
2
Fact: If it rains, then the field is wet. Read the following statements: It rains The field is not wet The field is wet It did not rain Which one of the options given below is NOT logically possible, based on the given fact? If $(iii)$, then $(iv)$. If $(i)$, then $(iii)$. If $(i)$ then $(ii)$. If $(ii)$, then $(iv)$.
asked Mar 26, 2018 in Analytical Aptitude Milicevic3306 7.9k points
0 votes
0 answers
3
In a group of four children, Som is younger to Riaz. Shiv is elder to Ansu. Ansu is youngest in the group. Which of the following statements is/are required to find the eldest child in the group? Statements 1. Shiv is younger to Riaz. 2. Shiv is ... eldest child Statements 1 and 2 are both required to determine the eldest child Statements 1 and 2 are not sufficient to determine the eldest child
asked Mar 26, 2018 in Analytical Aptitude Milicevic3306 7.9k points
0 votes
0 answers
4
All professors are researchers. Some scientists are professors. Which of the given conclusions is logically valid and is inferred from the above arguments: All scientists are researchers All professors are scientists Some researchers are scientists No conclusion follows
asked Mar 26, 2018 in Analytical Aptitude Milicevic3306 7.9k points
0 votes
0 answers
5
S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, and Z are seated around a circular table. T’s neighbours are Y and V. Z is seated third to the left of T and second to the right of S. U’s neighbour are S and Y; and T and W are not seated opposite each other. Who is third to the left of V? X W U T
asked Mar 26, 2018 in Analytical Aptitude Milicevic3306 7.9k points
...